This 2 by 2 study looking at both Epo and transfusion triggers in closed TBI makes interesting reading and re-reading. Although large outcome benefit levels were sought (20%) there was no difference in neurological outcome (or mortality, ARDS, infection rate) between Epo and placebo or between a transfusion trigger of 7 and 10. Nor did Epo seem to work convincingly. Part of the reason for trying Epo was an apparent animal experiment neuro-protective effect, clearly not very evident here. There was even potential harm from the higher transfusion target in the form of higher thromboembolic events (20 ‘v’ 8%) and from Epo in the form of (predominantly arm) DVT incidence. Maybe they should have looked for smaller benefit?
Blood boosting no good in TBI
-
July 7, 2014
FOAMcc search (ICM/EM sites)
LITFL
- Funtabulously Frivolous Friday Five 358 April 19, 2024
- Top 10 AI courses for clinicians April 19, 2024
- Emergency Procedure: Postpartum haemorrhage April 5, 2024
- Rutherford Morison April 1, 2024
- AI Tools for Learning March 25, 2024
Wessex ICS BottomLine
- Validation of the MIRACLE 2 Score for Prognostication After OOHCA March 22, 2024
- Critical Care Evidence Updates – February 2024 March 22, 2024
- Emergency Evidence Updates – February 2024 March 22, 2024
- ARiE Trial – Rifaximin for encephalopathy March 1, 2024
- Critical Care Evidence Updates – January 2024 February 23, 2024
Emcrit
- EMCrit 373 – Mike Weinstock with another Critical Care Bounceback: “Asymptomatic Hypertension” April 18, 2024
- Pulmcrit wee: The cutoff razor April 15, 2024
- EMCrit Wee – Ross Prager on 10 Heuristics for the New ICU Attending April 13, 2024
- EMCrit 372 – FoundStab Intubation SOP April 5, 2024
- EMCrit RACC-Lit Review – March 2024 March 28, 2024
Past posts
Post categories
RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.
RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.